Turing's WeeklyAI · agents · what's next

Ledgerwatch vs Cursorfox

Memory, tracing and evals for teams running agents in production. Computer-use agents that operate a browser the way a person would.

Sample data: every company, figure and person in the landscape is an illustrative placeholder until it is replaced with a sourced entry.

At a glance

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Ledgerwatch, Cursorfox
Ledgerwatch

Memory, tracing and evals for teams running agents in production.

Cursorfox

Computer-use agents that operate a browser the way a person would.

CategoryDiffersAgent InfrastructureBrowser/Computer-Use Agents
FoundedDiffers20232025
HeadquartersDiffersSeattle, United StatesLondon, United Kingdom
EmployeesDiffers51-20011-50
Total raisedDiffers$52M$11M
Latest roundDiffersSeries A, $38MSeed, $11M
Lead investorsDiffersSample CapitalExample Ventures
Open sourceYesYes
PricingDiffersfreemium, paidpaid, free
ProductsDiffersLedgerwatch Traces, Ledgerwatch Evals, Ledgerwatch MemoryCursorfox Runner, Cursorfox SDK
FoundersDiffersSample Founder O, Sample Founder PSample Founder Q, Sample Founder R

The weekly brief

Track Ledgerwatch, Cursorfox and the rest of the market.

New funding rounds, launches and shifts in the agent market, once a week.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Ledgerwatch and Cursorfox?
Ledgerwatch has raised more in total ($52M against $11M). Ledgerwatch is older, founded in 2023 against 2025 for Cursorfox. Ledgerwatch is in Agent Infrastructure, while Cursorfox is in Browser/Computer-Use Agents.
Which has raised more funding, Ledgerwatch or Cursorfox?
Ledgerwatch: $52M. Cursorfox: $11M.
Are Ledgerwatch and Cursorfox open source?
Ledgerwatch: open source. Cursorfox: open source.

More comparisons